Thought Creates

perserverance

2006-06-02T11:06:00.000-07:00

With perserverance in thought and seeking vistas open. I have been at this for a while and I am slowly understanding that we all exist on the zero point field and we are all made of the same stuff, a non substance we call energy. That is why we are all connected and we are all one. I am not sure what the benefit of that realization can be, but I am sure it would be powerful if it was useful.

The amount of energy contained in the zero point field is, for all practical purposes, limitless. What I am questioning next is why we can not form a material substance from pure thought. It seems that all manifesting is not accomplished directly, but achieved through other sources, namely; other humans. There must be some law regarding this, e.g. -- no createy, just relocatey -- like no tickey, no shirty ... hmmmmm... useful law??? at least, not in this form.

Out of the box

2005-05-12T05:24:00.000-07:00

Consider "biosphere," a term that encompases all the carbon based life forms on this planet. Universal intelligence, God, The All, whatever you wish call the pure creative force in the universe is constantly creating the energy of life in huge amounts all the time. This is the manifestation of biological or "life" energy.
Is it possible that there exists a sphere that could be called the "econsphere," or economic sphere with encompases the energy of money and wealth, Like the biosphere. this field would have its own rules, its "mathematics" that creation would have to follow.
For example, in the biosphere creation has to have raw materials that are ordered by intelligence to produce a frog. This is a tremendously complicated process which we are just beginning to understand, but we know a whole lot more about the process today than we did 200 years ago.
Would not econsphere work in the same way? And the real question, would approaching this in this fashion lead to "out of the box" thinking resulting in eventually controlling the economic process in a similar fashion to the way medical knowledge and intervention can direct the biological process. In other words, could we learn to heal ourselves economically?? Would that lead us down the path that we must follow to stop currently ever prsesent war and suffering transform the human experience into a predominately positive one?
Would a medical model be useful for discovery in the economic field? How do we "get out of the box" and start thinking in that direction?

Symptoms of Enlightment

2005-05-11T23:08:00.000-07:00

Losing your worries
Increase synchronicity

Two known signposts of enlightenment. The first is happening, the second is developing. I have a vision now that the intelligence of the universe is moving itself closer to my desires. Totally amazing -- like two newtonian bodies each acting on the other creating a result. Hmmm... I think I'll get quiet and see how far it can go.

What's the essence of ...?

2005-05-08T23:43:00.000-07:00

Somehow I managed to stumble back to

here

Here is the only place I know and Now is the only time that exists. The question that gnawing at me is: What's this blogging business anyway? Am I just contributing to the mindless drivel that exists in cyberspace or is there a fabric to this universe? Is my effort going to be worthwhile or am I just one more mindless jerk adding unnecessary and worthless stuff to the universe. Is this a waste of time because I am just some "mee too" person not meaning a whit? If that is the case I would rather spend my time fishing, sleeping, or daydreaming while waiting for the inevitable illness that will be my demise.
I have managed to achieve a level of conciousness where I alter time. Things, life, etc has slowed considerably for me. If I create this journal, it would be nice if it was appreciated by at least one other person also seeking to expose the underpinnings of the universe, at least for his or her's own sake; if not for the enlightment of others. Producing an effect in a kindred spirit makes the struggle worthwhile. Else I am like bowel gas in a whirlwind.

The physics of the issue

2004-10-30T06:55:00.000-07:00

After seeing the movie "What the Bleep... I have been looking into the nature of conciousness and its relationship to quantum mechanics. I attended a lecture by Dr. Wolf last Friday night and Saturday afternoon. I got quite inspired and have been search the net for more information. I found and have included a rather erudite discussion of the transformation of thought into action. It appears that we are getting closer to understanding more of how God works and it is quantum mechanical and completely "mind blowing" I to mark some more salient passages in color, but it didn't work here.

While this discussion is not the end all and be all of conciousness and creation,it is a great start! The journey, or "Holy Grail" that I have been pursuing is how can I intiate and control the process? In other words, I want to know how to shape all those particles, quarks, and strings into good old American Greenbacks ... And plenty of them! Even more important is to learn how that process can be effectively taught so we can eliminate poverty and misery from our incredible planet.

"

The Field of Qualia
by Jack Sarfatti
August 26, 1996
How are our thoughts -- our consciousness -- translated into action?"
I actually have a detailed theory of this based upon an extension of Bohm's 1952 quantum pilot-wave/classical material hidden variable theory.

Note, the more modern term for "hidden-variable" is John Bellâ€™s term "beable".

The inner quantum information density field I(x,t), whose range is in quantum Hilbert space H and whose domain is in classical configuration space C , is, quite literally, the "field of thought patterns" that make up the implicate order. These patterns of I(x,t) exert a quantum force

Fq = - Grad Q
Q = -(1/2)[ (GradI)^2 + (Grad)^2I]

on the brain material beable B moving in C. Thatâ€™s how thought is translated into action.

The field of thought-patterns or qualia I(x,t), together with external environmental classical forces Fe create basins of attraction for the flow of the brain system point B in C. Qualia are encoded in these attractors. When B occupies a given attractor basin the corresponding thought-pattern is felt i.e., experienced. This attractor structure in C is the quantum version of the fractal strange attractors of classical chaos theory which leaves out the thought-field force from I(x,t). In the classical limit only Fe creates the attractor structure in C. The pattern of classical Fe forces represent the Darwinian natural selection pressures of the environment. To complete this model of a complex conscious adaptive system, we need a mechanism for self-organization. Without self-organization there is no conscious intent, no purposeful explicate behavior, and no "felt" implicate conscious experience. I have shown how implicate thought becomes explicate action. We now have to show how the brain-beable B in C literally and directly changes its thought-field I(x,t) whose range is quantum Hilbert space H. This is the back-action b mechanism by which the structure of H is modified by the actual path taken by B in C. But, that path of B in C is determined by both the implicate Fq = - Grad Q and the explicate Darwinian Fe. Therefore, Fq,Fe, from I(x,t) to B, together with back-action b from B to I(x,t) is a self-organizing cybernetic feedback-control creative strange loop that creates the conscious experience and allows the I-B system to make freely-willed choices which are the results of classically nonalgorithmic quantum computations. Now I can prove rigorously, that only when such a strange loop of Godel self-reference is operating, is there an experience of one actual world. This is a Bohmian ontological model that derives Wignerâ€™s and von-Neumannâ€™s epistemological idea that "consciousness collapses the wave function". The strange loop means that the mind (I)-brain (B) complex adaptive system is continually measuring itself. Only then, is there the inner "felt" experience of "qualia". This is the quantum dynamo generating our streams of consciousness.

"the wave function is linear or passive in that it requires an outside agent to select events ....."
That is exactly what back-action is -- it is the "outside agent", except it is really inside. It is the generator of consciousness.

To be more precise. The usual picture of quantum measurement has a measuring apparatus M and the system being measured N. They are not the same system. That leads to the measurement problem which you discuss pretty well in its different aspects. Now Bohm thought he had solved this measurement problem and up until recently I thought he was correct. But now, in dialogue with Henry Stapp, I see a non-fatal, but serious, flaw in Bohmâ€™s argument. Bohm is able to correctly show why it is that fringes disappear in the double slit experiment if a measurement of "which slit 1 or 2?" the particle P passes is made even though the particle wave packets and overlap on the screen. Where x is the position on the screen. This is because of the EPR correlation

M,N) = m1)n1) + m2)n2)
Therefore,

(xM,N) = m1)(xn1) + m2)(xn2)
So,

(xM,N)2 = (xn1)2 + (xn2)2
because (m1m2) = 0. That is, the two measuring wavepackets have zero overlap in their classical configuration subspace Cm. The EPR correlation between M and N implies an incoherent superposition of the particle wave packets (xn1) and (xn2) even though they do overlap in their classical configuration subspace Cn.

Bohm then makes an incorrect next step for the actual path of the hidden variable P in Cn. He says that one can think that P is really in either (xn1) or (xn2) . The occupied wave packet is the "active information" and the empty one is "inactive information". Bohm is trying to establish that only one of the wave packets for P is totally determining the classical mechanical, possibly chaotic, attractor structure for the path of P in Cn. That is, Bohm wrongly thinks that, because of the EPR correlation of N to nonoverlapping packets in Cm, that the attractor structure in Cn is in 1-1 correspondence with the P wave packets (xn1) and (xn2). But what is true for the wave is not true for the particle. A careful analysis of Bohmâ€™s equations of motion for P under the action of the nonlocal quantum force - gradQ show that both (xn1) and (xn2) contribute to the quantum force on P in the region of overlap in Cn. Of course, the details of the quantum force pattern on the possible paths of P in the incoherent case is very different from what it is in the coherent case where no measurement of which slit is made. The serious problem however, is that both classically incompatible worlds continue to influence the motion of P. This is not a problem in "collapse" models because one of the packets (xn1) or (xn2) miraculously vanishes. But Bohmâ€™s theory cannot make this Deux ex Machina. The only consistent way there can be a 1-1 correspondence between the wave packets or "channels" and the attractor structure is if there really is no overlap in Cn. This is generally not the case in orthodox linear passive quantum mechanics. The only way to solve the problem is to consider complex systems that are able to measure themselves. Such a complex system is conscious almost by definition. That is, if N is the same as M the problem is solved because then there is only one classical configuration space C and a good "self measurement" means no overlap in C of the different wave packets that correspond to classically incompatible worlds. The hidden-variable must be in only one of those wave packets. It can never escape that particular packet because the quantum repulsive force is infinite at the edges where the wave packet is zero. But how can this happen? This can only happen if there is a direct back-action b from the path of P in C to the total wavefunction. As explained earlier this results in the self-organizing ability of all living systems. Back-action is the universal physical mechanism for life. What happens is that the self-measuring system self-organizes its wave function so that it splits into nonoverlapping wave packets. That is, the system creates its own measuring observable N in a self-consistent way and then chooses which channel to occupy. This is free will. Only conscious systems can do this trick. Without back-action beyond orthodox quantum theory there is never an effective collapse into one actual classical world.

So your "level one" is the hidden-variable material system of classical particles and classical fields. Your "level two" is the "passive" quantum pilot wave. Finally, your "level three" is the back-action b which enables the coming into being of the conscious self-organizing adaptive system that selects its own destiny. This is the physical meaning of freedom.

Thank you, Jack. This discussion shows that in our screwy quantum mechanical universe it is likely that our mental processes definately operate on the system meaning that pure a-priori manifestation may exist. The first step to doing it is finding and believing that it is possible. Next step, how?

Are Emotions the key?

2004-10-17T10:42:00.000-07:00

Thought that drift in produce feelings, emotional states -- In the wild natural state most of them have been negative producing bad or unpleasant states. They seem to cause a log jam blocking flow. This appears to produce negativity that prevents manifestation. Is it true? How to change it is another question.

Meditation

2004-10-16T23:20:00.000-07:00

I think the first and probably continious task is meditation. I return to this constantly. Recently I have been experimenting with

Letting go Leaving the

Letting go Leaving the ego behind. I have noticed reduced internal conflict. Does this get me closer to my goal? Are there experimental parameters? Exploration continues.

Where we start

2004-10-16T22:58:00.000-07:00

Recent studies of quantum mechanics and string theory have convinced me of the viability of the statement, "Thoughts are things." My goal is to learn to learn to create "things" from pure thought. In particular, I want to discover if it is possible to create in my possession a significant number of good old US greenbacks from thought alone. So, let's get started.